Jason Lowery’s Softwar “thesis” is a whole joke. It’s a mixture of incoherent, and subtly so, argumentation about cybersecurity and a repackaging of previous subjects of dialogue that have been totally explored a decade earlier than Jason Lowery turned a reputation that anybody was conversant in on this area.
First let’s have a look at the nation state mining “defensive weaponry” nonsense. Nation states being incentivized to mine, or assist mining of their jurisdictions, will not be some novel thought of Jason’s. It’s a broadly mentioned dynamic going way back to 2011-2013. Primarily each Bitcoiner since that point interval who has been concerned sufficient on this area to review and talk about the place issues have been moving into the long run has thought-about the dynamic of countries getting concerned with mining if Bitcoin was really profitable in its development long run.
If Bitcoin ever turned geopolitically related at a world scale, nation states have been at all times going to take an curiosity within the mining sector. Nation states have an involvement in regulating all main commodities and their manufacturing, from gold to grease and pure gasoline. This isn’t some novel thesis or notion, it’s common sense that was apparent to each random nerd who was on this area over a decade in the past.
The facet of Bitcoin securing information nonetheless is patently absurd and incoherent. Bitcoin doesn’t “safe” information. It will probably timestamp information, however that isn’t a magic assure of safety. It does nothing in any way to guard information from exfiltration (being accessed by unauthorized individuals and copied), nor does it assure integrity or accuracy. All information on the blockchain is publicly accessible to anybody working a node. The concept of Bitcoin being helpful for controlling entry to info is simply absurd. By its very nature any information placed on Bitcoin is accessible by actually anybody. That’s the total bedrock it’s primarily based on, the whole lot being open and clear in order that it may be verified.
So let’s discuss paywalls, APIs, and nonsense gibberish like “digital power.” Lowery’s subsequent large bounce is that charging in bitcoin for API calls someway improves safety. That is full nonsense. Limiting entry to an API is completed for 2 causes, 1) to handle useful resource use and cease them from being wasted, or 2) to solely permit particular people you’ve licensed to entry the API. Bitcoin may also help with the previous barely, however does nothing in any way to assist with the latter.
Even monetizing an API with bitcoin doesn’t actually assist useful resource administration defending in opposition to DoS assaults. Individuals can nonetheless ship packets to your machine with out a cost. These packets nonetheless should be diverted or managed by conventional DoS methods, which usually work by blackholing packets, or redirecting them away out of your system. Bitcoin funds do nothing to eliminate the necessity to do such issues.
A cash that anybody can get their fingers on does nothing to limit entry to a system to solely particular individuals that you just need to entry that system. Cryptography does that. Passwords do this. Applied sciences that exist already fully independently of, and haven’t any want for, Bitcoin. To not point out that even with such methods correctly applied, the {hardware} and software program on the system being secured is in the end what secures that system. Individuals don’t fail to breach a server as a result of “Bitcoin is defending it,” they fail as a result of the safety methods on that server are correctly applied.
Bitcoin, and even correct cryptography with out Bitcoin, does nothing to maintain a system safe when implementations are executed incorrectly or flaws exist in these methods. That’s the root of cybersecurity, and Bitcoin does completely nothing to alter it. It doesn’t assist {hardware} be free from flaws, or safety software program be free from bugs. This whole facet of his “thesis” is completely incoherent gibberish, that makes no logical sense in any respect. It’s a con to sucker in individuals who don’t perceive these items and construct a fame by hiding incoherence and incompetence behind clueless individuals cheerleading.
And the entire “Bitcoin will cease wars” nonsense as a result of nation states will compete with mining in opposition to one another? Laughable. Bitcoin mining won’t change the geopolitical competitors over agricultural lands, pure assets, tactical navy positions, or something that nation states go to conflict over. It’s pure delusion.
Jason Lowery doesn’t have a “thesis”, he has a pile of incoherent rubbish taped collectively round a single commentary that an uncountable variety of Bitcoiners had a decade earlier than he ever entered this area. It’s a whole joke, and anybody shopping for it demonstrates they’ve zero essential pondering expertise or familiarity with the related subject material.
This text is a Take. Opinions expressed are solely the creator’s and don’t essentially replicate these of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Journal.