Cantor Fitzgerald’s evaluation highlights Solana’s treasury technique of accumulating SOL by means of transaction price income reasonably than ETH’s promote stress from gasoline charges. Not like Ethereum’s burn mechanism, Solana’s method creates a self-sustaining ecosystem the place community progress straight funds improvement. This structural distinction makes SOL probably extra engaging to long-term buyers involved about dilution.
Solana’s treasury mannequin aligns validator incentives with ecosystem well being, as node operators earn SOL proportional to community utilization. Contrasted with Ethereum’s advanced price market and EIP-1559 burns, Solana affords clearer tokenomics for institutional buyers. The technique mirrors company share buybacks, theoretically growing SOL’s shortage as adoption grows.
This treasury benefit comes amid Solana’s technical enhancements decreasing downtime and congestion. By combining strong infrastructure with economically aligned token insurance policies, SOL positions itself as an institutional-grade blockchain. Nonetheless, Ethereum’s first-mover benefit and bigger DeFi ecosystem stay aggressive components that might offset these treasury advantages.
This text is for informational functions solely and doesn’t represent monetary recommendation. Please conduct your personal analysis earlier than making any funding choices.
Be at liberty to “borrow” this text — simply don’t overlook to hyperlink again to the unique.
Editor-in-Chief / Coin Push Dean is a crypto fanatic based mostly in Amsterdam, the place he follows each twist and switch on this planet of cryptocurrencies and Web3.